Itxa/2276/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4 Mumbai v. Jash Securities Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2276/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4 Mumbai v. Jash Securities Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/2276/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4 Mumbai v. Jash Securities Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the impugned order dated 31/8/2009 is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for de novo consideration.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2276 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Jash Securities Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant.
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.By an ex-parte order dated 23/12/2008, the ITAT had allowed the appeal filed by the revenue, thereby setting aside the order of CIT(A) and restoring the order of the assessing officer. Thus, royalty paid by the assessee to the firm stood disallowed.
2.Thereafter, on an application made by the assessee, the ex-parte order was recalled and the matter was heard afresh.
3.By the impugned order dated 31/8/2009, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue. No reasons are given in the impugned order as to why the Tribunal disagreed with its view contained in para 18 of its earlier order wherein the appeal filed by the revenue was allowed.
4.In this view of the matter, counsel for the parties state that the order of the ITAT dated 31/8/2009 passed in I.T.A. No.218/Mum/2006 relating to AY 2001-02 be quashed and set aside and the matter be restored to the file of ITAT for de novo consideration in accordance with law. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 31/8/2009 is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for de novo consideration.
5.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.