Itxa/2292/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xii,Mum v. Manoj Sadaramgani
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2292/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xii,Mum v. Manoj Sadaramgani
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2292/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xii,Mum v. Manoj Sadaramgani, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.240 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Manoj Sadarangani ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The learned Tribunal relied upon the
Judgment of this Court in C.I.T. V/s. J.K. Investors
C.I.T. V/s. J.K. Investors248 I.T.R. 723. Considering the above, in
reported in 248 I.T.R. 723
our opinion, the question of law as framed would not
arise. Hence appeal is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue