In Itxa/2299/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,3,Mum v. M/S Tcfc Finance Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal is right in holding that the lease transactions entered into by the assessee were finance transactions and the finance charges received by the assessee is not in the natur...
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.4 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.4 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.TCFC Finance Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.S.M.Shah for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for rival parties. By
consent, the appeal is taken up for final hearing.
2. The appeal seeks to raise the following
question of law :-
" Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, Tribunal is right
in holding that the lease transactions
entered into by the assessee were finance
transactions and the finance charges
received by the assessee is not in the
nature of interest income and therefore tax
cannot be levied ? "
3. Both counsel agree that the issue sought to
be raised in the present appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Commissionerof Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock BrokersP.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421. In this
view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed in limini
with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.