Itxa/231/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinodrai M. Kanani Huf
High Court
24 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/231/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinodrai M. Kanani Huf
Date of order
24 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/231/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinodrai M. Kanani Huf, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.231 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant.
¦ Mr.Parag Pardiwala with
¦ Ms.Deepali Thakkar i/b Rustomji &
¦ Ginwala for the Respondent.
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:24TH JULY, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for both
sides. In our opinion, the tribunal
has rightly recorded that it was the
case of mere change of opinion and
there could not have been any reason
to believe that any income has
escaped assessment. No question of
law arises. Hence, appeal is
rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue