Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2315/2011 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/2315/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc)

High Court 27 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2315/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc)
Date of order
27 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/2315/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc), the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: In this Appeal for the Assessment Year 2004-05 by the Revenue, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law and on interpretation of the provision of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, whether the Assessee is entitled t...

Decision: 3 Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2315 OF 2011 The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)..Appellant.V/s.Maharashtra State Road TransportCorporation (MSRTC)..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 27[th] FEBRUARY, 2013. In this Appeal for the Assessment Year 2004-05 by the Revenue, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law and on interpretation of the provision of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, whether the Assessee is entitled to carry forward the deficits Rs.1796654011/- to subsequent year for being set off against the surplus if any, in the subsequent years? 2We find that the Tribunal by its impugned order has allowed the claim of the Respondent-Assessee by following decision of this Court in the matter of CIT v/s. Institute of Banking reported in 264 ITR page 110. In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain proposed question of law. 3 Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan