In Itxa/2316/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-1, Mumbai v. M/S. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence for the reasons stated therein these appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2316 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2317 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd. (now changed toR & P Management Communcations P. Ltd.)
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. F.V. Irani with A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised in the assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal No.2268 of 2009 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 14th September, 2011. Hence for the reasons stated therein these appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue