Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2322/2011 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/2322/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. M.i.g. Cricket Club

High Court 27 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2322/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. M.i.g. Cricket Club
Date of order
27 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/2322/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( Exemption) v. M.i.g. Cricket Club, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2321OF 2011WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2322 OF 2011 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption)..Appellant.V/s.M.I.G. Cricket Club..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant in both the matters.Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar, for the Respondent in both the matters. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 27[th] FEBRUARY, 2013. In these Appeals for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2002-03 by the Revenue, following common questions have been raised for our consideration:- (a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in law in confirming the order of CIT(A), without appreciating the fact that the assessee though registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act as charitable institution, if the assessee/institution is a mutual concern his income is required to be assessed under the principle of mutually? (b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) holding that the assessee is entitle to exemption under Section 11 of the Act? 2Since the Tribunal has allowed the claim of the Respondent-Assessee by following the decision of this Court in the Respondent-Assessee's own case in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2378 of 2009 (Director of Income Tax v/s. MIG Cricket Club) rendered on 30[th] November, 2009, we see no reason to entertain the proposed questions of law. 3Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan