In Itxa/2326/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 Mumbai v. Kiran Agarwal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2326 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Kiran L. Agrawal
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant.Mr. N.M. Porwal for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH JANUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue and learned counsel for the respondents agree in stating that the issue which arises in the appeal is covered against the revenue by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 8th August, 2008 in Commissioner of Income Tax, City II V/s. Laxminarayan S. Agarwal in Income Tax Appeal No.427 of 2005. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has followed the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.