Itxa/2337/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. Rajendra R. Shah
High Court
04 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2337/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. Rajendra R. Shah
Date of order
04 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2337/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. Rajendra R. Shah, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1072 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nashik
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Rajendra R. Shah
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. R.D. Soni i/b. Ram & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 4TH OCTOBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised by the revenue in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai V/s. Shri Jayraj Kapadia [Income Tax Appeal No.5487 of 2010]
has been rejected by this Court on 15[th] July, 2011. For the reasons stated therein the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue