Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2341/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2341/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 Mumbai v. M/S. Chaitra Holdings P Ltd

High Court 17 Nov 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2341/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 Mumbai v. M/S. Chaitra Holdings P Ltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/2341/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9 Mumbai v. M/S. Chaitra Holdings P Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The questions sought to be raised in the above appeals relate to the question whether the income by way of commission should be treated as "business income" or "income from other sources".

Decision: 4.In the result, all these appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2341 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2079 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2119 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Chaitra Holdings Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The questions sought to be raised in the above appeals relate to the question whether the income by way of commission should be treated as "business income" or "income from other sources". The question was considered by the Tribunal in paragraph No.7 of its order. 2.The Tribunal has specifically relied upon the assessment orders passed in the case of assessee itself for the assessment years 1995-96 and thereafter which have been accepted by the revenue; wherein categorical finding has been recorded that the department had been satisfied in the earlier years about the services being rendered by the assessee. 3.If the earlier orders passed by the Tribunal in case of assessee itself have been accepted by the Revenue and the assessment orders of the earlier years have attained finality then, without strong and cogent reason, revenue cannot be allowed to blow hot and cold. No reasons are disclosed for taking contrary stance. Under these circumstances, we do not see appeals involve any substantial question of law. 4.In the result, all these appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan