Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/234/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/234/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. M/S. Essar Properties Ltd

High Court 11 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/234/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. M/S. Essar Properties Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/234/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. M/S. Essar Properties Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In these circumstances, for the reasons set out in the order dated 28[th ]February, 2012, this appeal fails and it is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.234 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax 5-Versus-M/s. Essar Properties Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent ...................... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- 11[th] June, 2014 P.C.: 1]This appeal challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Mumbai, dated 6[th] July, 2011 in Income Tax Appeal No.2534/MUM/2010. The assessment year in question is 2006-07. 2]Mr. Suresh Kumar submits that this appeal raises a substantial question of law, that has been formulated by the Revenue at page 4 of the paper book. 3]However, Mr. Suresh Kumar was fair to bring to our notice the order of the Division Bench dated 28[th] February, 2012 in Income Tax Appeal 1/2 *2* 6.itxa234.12 Lodging No.1432 of 2011. That was an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the tribunal in case of the very assessee before us. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal by holding that it does not raise any substantial question of law. The order of the Division Bench, thus, clearly applies to the present appeal. The questions of law raised in this appeal as also the appeal dealt with by the Division Bench, are identical. In these circumstances, for the reasons set out in the order dated 28[th ]February, 2012, this appeal fails and it is dismissed. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa 2/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan