Case Law › High Court › Itxa/2350/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2350/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S Peddington Chemical Industries (India)

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Oct 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/2350/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S Peddington Chemical Industries (India), the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1066 OF 2006 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1066 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Peddington Chemical Industries ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is dismissed. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.