Itxa/235/2009 Of D.b. Investments, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Ward -23 (1) (2), Mumbai
High Court
15 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/235/2009 Of D.b. Investments, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Ward -23 (1) (2), Mumbai
Date of order
15 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/235/2009 Of D.b. Investments, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Ward -23 (1) (2), Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, keeping all the contentions open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.235 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.235 OF 2009
D.B.Investments ..Appellant.
V/s.
The Income Tax Officer ..Respondent.
Mr.Vipul Joshi i/b. Sameer G. Dalal for appellant.
Ms.Suchita Kamble for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
On the motion made by learned counsel
appearing the appellant, he is allowed to be withdraw
the appeal. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no
order as to costs, keeping all the contentions open.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue