Itxa/2362/2011 Of The Development Bank Of Singapore Ltd v. Additional Director Of Income-Tax (It)-1(2
High Court
18 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2362/2011 Of The Development Bank Of Singapore Ltd v. Additional Director Of Income-Tax (It)-1(2
Date of order
18 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/2362/2011 Of The Development Bank Of Singapore Ltd v. Additional Director Of Income-Tax (It)-1(2, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2362 OF 2011
Development Bank of Singapore Limited(Now known as DBS Bank Limited)..AppellantVersus
Additional Director of Income-tax (IT)-1(2) ..Respondent
...................
Ms. Tasneem Zaveri i/by Kanga & Company for the Appellant.Ms. Tasneem Zaveri i/by Kanga & Company for the Appellant.
Mr. Sham Walve h/f. Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondent.Mr. Sham Walve h/f. Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondent.
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Ms. Zaveri, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Walve, learned counsel holding for Mr.Pinto, learnedstanding counsel revenue for the respondent.
2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantagainst the order dated 20.04.2011 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'L' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A. No.1787/M/2004 for the assessment year 1999-2000.
3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 24.11.2014on the substantial question of law framed in the said order.
4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed bylearned counsel for the appellant.
5.It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the DirectTax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter)providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes.Appellant has filed a declaration under section 3 of the saidAct before the Designated Authority which has thereafterissued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Actdetermining the amount of tax payable by the appellant.However, for passing of the final order under section 5(2) ofthe said Act, appellant is required to withdraw the appeal interms of section 4(3) thereof. Hence, the prayer forwithdrawal of the appeal.
6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection tothe prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal.
7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed ofas withdrawn.
8.Refund as per Rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.02.1914:38:06+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.