Itxa/2378/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum-I v. M/S Nilkamal Plastics Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2378/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum-I v. M/S Nilkamal Plastics Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2378/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum-I v. M/S Nilkamal Plastics Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.379 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Nilkamal Plastics Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant.
Mr.Sameer G. Dalal for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is also
dismissed. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue