Itxa/238/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum v. Cascade Holdings P.ltd
High Court
31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/238/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum v. Cascade Holdings P.ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/238/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum v. Cascade Holdings P.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.238 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Central II, Bombay ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Cascade Holdings P.Ltd., ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the Appellant.
Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel both the sides.
2. So far as question of law 3,4 and 5 are
concerned, it is fairly stated that they are
covered by order dated 12-03-2008 passed in Income
Tax Appeal (L) No.2214 of 2006.
3. So far as question of law 1 and 2 are
concerned, it is common ground that the appellant
is a party notified under Special Court (Trial of
Offences relating to Transactions in Securities)
Act, 1992 and, therefore, no fault can be found
with the order of the tribunal.
4. There is no substance in the appeal.
Hence, rejected.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J. D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue