Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2384/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2384/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16,Mum v. Shri Shashi Shrichand Sadarangani,Mum

High Court 17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2384/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16,Mum v. Shri Shashi Shrichand Sadarangani,Mum
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2384/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16,Mum v. Shri Shashi Shrichand Sadarangani,Mum, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.122 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.122 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant. V/s. Shri Shashi Shrichand Sadarangi ..Respondent. Mr.S.R.Chauhan with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Taken up for hearing forthwith Considering paragraph 4 of the order of the Tribunal, which has relied upon the Judgment of this Court in J.K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd. 248 I.T.R. 723 the question of law does not arise. Hence appeal is dismissed. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan