Itxa/2389/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16 v. Suresh Virendra Bhagat
High Court
05 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2389/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16 v. Suresh Virendra Bhagat
Date of order
05 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2389/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16 v. Suresh Virendra Bhagat, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
169, 71,72 itxa 1443-18, 2242-18, 2389-18-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1443 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-16
V/s.
Shakti Pratap L. Parmar
… Appellant
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2242 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-16… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Khaitan & Co.
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2389 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-16… Appellant
V/s.
Suresh Virendra Bhagat … Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal).
Priya Soparkar
269, 71,72 itxa 1443-18, 2242-18, 2389-18-o
2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue