Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/239/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax(...

Itxa/239/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Credit Lyonnais

High Court 31 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/239/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Credit Lyonnais
Date of order
31 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/239/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Credit Lyonnais, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.239 OF 2015 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT)-I )...APPELLANT V/s. M/S.CREDIT LYONNAIS)...RESPONDENT Mr.Tejveer Singh, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Counsel, a/w. Mr.Madhur Agarwal and Mr.A.K.Jasani, Advocate for the Respondent. P.C. : 1The present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2004- 2005. 2 The learned counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the question raised in the present appeal were subject matter for consideration in assessee's own case for the assessment year avk 1/2 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 in Income Tax Appeal Nos.1781 of 2014 and 1748 of 2014. The said questions are decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. 3In light of the above, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. (A. M. BADAR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.) avk 2/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan