Itxa/2396/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Indusind Bank Ltd
High Court
04 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2396/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Indusind Bank Ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/2396/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Indusind Bank Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2396 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Indusland Bank Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Padma Divakar for the appellant.
Mr. Nishant Thakkar i/b. Mint & Confrers for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2013
P.C. :-
1.In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 2004-05, the following question has been raised for our consideration :-
“ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in excluding from the total income of the assessee company the amount of interest of Rs.44,16,08,111/- which has accrued but not fallen due or received ? ”
2.Counsel for the parties state that the issue is covered in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the respondent-assessee's own case in Income Tax Appeal No.1621 of 2011 rendered on 12[th] February, 2013. In view of the reasons stated in our order dated 12[th] February, 20111 in Income Tax Appeal No.1621 of 2011, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to
costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.