Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2398/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2398/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Elpro International Ltd

High Court 31 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2398/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Elpro International Ltd
Date of order
31 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2398/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Elpro International Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.The question of law raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the reopening of assessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act after the lapse of four years cannot be sustained.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2398 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Mumbai V/s.M/s.Elpro International Ltd., ..... Appellants ..... Respondents ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellants. Mr.Sanjay M. Shah for the respondents. ---- CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE :31/1/ 2011 P.C. 1.The question of law raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the reopening of assessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act after the lapse of four years cannot be sustained. 2Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that the Tribunal has recorded the finding of fact that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly material facts of the assessment. The decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact. There is no material to take contrary view in the matter. 3In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal. The same is dismissed. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan