Itxa/240/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Tata Honeywell Ltd
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/240/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Tata Honeywell Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/240/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Tata Honeywell Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.240 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
¦
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:7TH AUGUST, 2008
P.C.:
The matter was adjourned twice to
enable the learned Counsel appearing
for the Appellant to get the brief.
He states that he is not yet
received the brief. In our opinion,
keeping the matter pending will not
serve anybody’s interest. Appeal
is, therefore, rejected. However,
the Appellants shall be at liberty
to apply for restoration of the
appeal, if they are able to trace
their brief.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue