Itxa/241/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Dynamic Course And Career Cantre P Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/241/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Dynamic Course And Career Cantre P Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/241/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Dynamic Course And Career Cantre P Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 241 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Dynamic Courses and Career Centre
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr. Subhash Shetty for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 1[st] AUGUST, 2018.
1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2001-02.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenueinvited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax (CBDT). The aboveCircular directs the Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to theHigh Court where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. It alsodirects its Officers to withdraw / not press its pending appeals wherethe tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fallin the excluded class of appeals listed therein.
3.In the above view, Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing
in support of the appeal, on instructions from Mr. Selvagandhi S. ITO,
Mumbai, seeks to withdraw this appeal.
4.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
5.Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.