Itxa/2422/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. L. C. Patel (Huf)
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2422/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. L. C. Patel (Huf)
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2422/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18, Mumbai v. L. C. Patel (Huf), the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.785 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.785 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri L.C. Patel (HUF) ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah for appellant.
Ms.Aasifa Khan for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
As the Motion is dismissed, appeal is
dismissed. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue