Itxa/2451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai - 9 v. M/S Pix Auto Ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai - 9 v. M/S Pix Auto Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai - 9 v. M/S Pix Auto Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- As the Motion is dismissed, the appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.809 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.809 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Saurashtra Ball Pen Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Sandeep Wasnik with S.M.Shah for appellant.
Mr.Vishnu S. Hadade for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
As the Motion is dismissed, the appeal is
also dismissed. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue