Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/245/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/245/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Mumbai v. General Insurance Coerporation Of India, Mumbai

High Court 23 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/245/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Mumbai v. General Insurance Coerporation Of India, Mumbai
Date of order
23 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/245/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Mumbai v. General Insurance Coerporation Of India, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: Considering the above, both the appeals are dismissed at this stage with liberty to the revenue to apply for recalling the order if the permission from C.O.D. is received.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.243 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.243 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.243 OF 2009 WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.245 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.245 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. General Insurance Corporation of India ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. There is nothing on record to show that the permission of C.O.D. was taken. Considering the above, both the appeals are dismissed at this stage with liberty to the revenue to apply for recalling the order if the permission from C.O.D. is received. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan