Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2454/2018 Of Everest Industries Ltd...

Itxa/2454/2018 Of Everest Industries Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1, Mumbai

High Court 14 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2454/2018 Of Everest Industries Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1, Mumbai
Date of order
14 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/2454/2018 Of Everest Industries Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range-1, Mumbai, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2454 OF 2018 Everest Industries LtdVersusAdditional Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-1, Mumbai ..Appellant ..Respondent ................... Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the AppellantMr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant Mr. Sham Walve for the Respondent ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 14, 2021. P.C.: Heard Mr. Jasani, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Walve, learned standing counsel Revenue for therespondent. 2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantagainst the order dated 15.09.2017 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'I' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A. No. 1971/ Mum/2013 for the assessment year 2007-08. 3.The appeal is pending for admission. 5.It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the DirectTax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter)providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes.Appellant has filed a declaration under section 3 of the saidAct on 23.12.2020 before the Designated Authority whichhas thereafter issued a certificate under section 5(1) of thesaid Act on 09.01.2021 determining the amount payable atnil to the appellant. However, for passing of the final orderunder section 5(2) of the said Act, appellant is required towithdraw the appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof. Hence, the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. 6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection tothe prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal. 7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed ofas withdrawn. 8.Refund as per Rules. 9.This order will be digitally signed by the PrivateSecretary of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitallysigned byRavindraM.AmberkarRavindra M.AmberkarDate:2021.01.1514:23:03+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan