In Itxa/246/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii,Mum v. Smt Asha Vinesh Mehta, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: The appeal was admitted on 24/07/2008 on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs.20,21,905/- made under sec.68/69C of the Act without appreciating the fact that...
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.246 of 2008
The Commissioner of Income tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Smt. Asha Vinesh Mehta
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. The appeal was admitted on 24/07/2008 on the following question of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs.20,21,905/- made under sec.68/69C of the Act without appreciating the fact that actually no such jewellery and diamonds were sold to the parties and bogus bills were obtained ? "
2.The issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. UttamchandJainreported in (2009) 26 DTR (Bom) 23in favour of the assessee. In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.