Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/246/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-...

Itxa/246/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii,Mum v. Smt Asha Vinesh Mehta

High Court 23 Sep 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/246/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii,Mum v. Smt Asha Vinesh Mehta
Date of order
23 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/246/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii,Mum v. Smt Asha Vinesh Mehta, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Issue: The appeal was admitted on 24/07/2008 on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs.20,21,905/- made under sec.68/69C of the Act without appreciating the fact that...

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.246 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant. V/s. Smt. Asha Vinesh Mehta ..Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. The appeal was admitted on 24/07/2008 on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs.20,21,905/- made under sec.68/69C of the Act without appreciating the fact that actually no such jewellery and diamonds were sold to the parties and bogus bills were obtained ? " 2.The issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. UttamchandJainreported in (2009) 26 DTR (Bom) 23in favour of the assessee. In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan