Case Law › High Court › Itxa/247/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/247/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Central -Ii,Mub v. M/S Hindustan Construction Co.ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/247/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Central -Ii,Mub v. M/S Hindustan Construction Co.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: In this view of the matter, this appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.247 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central - II, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Hindustan Construction Co.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Yogesh Patki with Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the Appellant. Mr.S.M. Shah for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is pressing only questions of law regarding retention money and depreciation. According to him both the points are covered by our order passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.276 of 2006 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No.273 of 2006 respectively. Statement is accepted. 3. In this view of the matter, this appeal is disposed of. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.