Case Law › High Court › Itxa/247/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/247/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 Mumbai v. M/S. Apl (India) Pvtl. Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 16 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/247/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 Mumbai v. M/S. Apl (India) Pvtl. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Respondent.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.S.J.Mehta for the respondent.CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16th April 2009.P.C. :----.Learned counsel for the appellant- Revenuesubmits that he does not want press this appeal.Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax-8,Mumbai.... Appellant.V/s.M/s.APL (India) Pvt.Ltd.... Respondent.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.S.J.Mehta for the respondent.CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16th April 2009.P.C. :----.Learned counsel for the appellant- Revenuesubmits that he does not want press this appeal.Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as tocosts.(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.