Itxa/2480/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S. Glorious Reality Pvt. Ltd
High Court
12 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2480/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S. Glorious Reality Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
12 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2480/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M/S. Glorious Reality Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following that order and finding that there is no substantial question of law arising from the order of deletion of penalty, that this Appeal fails and it is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2480 OF 2013
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2217 OF 2013(NOT ON BOARD)
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5 OF 2014(NOT ON BOARD)
…
Commissioner of Income Tax-6
...Appellant
v/s.M/s.Glorious Reality Pvt.Ltd.
...Respondent
…
Mr.Sureshkumar for the Appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondent.
...
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 12 DECEMBER 2014
P.C.
Though the Appeal is listed under the group of similar
matters for “Direction”, both sides agreed that the same can be disposed of. Accordingly, it is taken up as listed for “Admission”.
2.The Tribunal's order passed on 19 June 2013 in Income
Tax Appeal No.380/M/2012 for Assessment Year 1999-2000 is challenged on the substantial questions of law at para 4(a) & 4(b) of the Paper Book.
itxa-2480-13.doc
3.The Tribunal deleted the penalty and upon being satisfied that the ingredients of section 271(1)(c) read with explanation-1 are not attracted, leave alone satisfied in this case. A similar order came to be challenged by the Revenue for prior Assessment Year in Income Tax Appeal No.2253 of 2009. The Division Bench of this Court dismissed that Appeal on 5 January 2010. Following that order and finding that there is no substantial question of law arising from the order of deletion of penalty, that this Appeal fails and it is dismissed.
4.By consent of parties, two other Appeals, being Income Tax Appeal No.2217 of 2013 and Income Tax Appeal No.5 of 2014, raising the same question are also taken up for admission on today's Daily Board and are disposed of by this order.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.