Itxa/252/2003 Of The Commissionero Income Tax,Bombay, City-X v. M/Strenton Investment Co.ltd
High Court
07 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/252/2003 Of The Commissionero Income Tax,Bombay, City-X v. M/Strenton Investment Co.ltd
Date of order
07 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/252/2003 Of The Commissionero Income Tax,Bombay, City-X v. M/Strenton Investment Co.ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.252 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
City - X, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Trenton Investments Co.Pvt.Ltd... Respondent.
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. K.B. Rao for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2004.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The issue raised in this appeal stands
concluded by the Division Bench judgment of this
court in the case of Cadell Weaving Mills Co. P.
Ltd. V/s. CIT [249 ITR 265].
3. The learned counsel for the revenue,
however, submits that the said judgment is under
challenge before the Supreme Court. Even if that be
so, in so far as we are concerned the controversy
stands concluded by the Division Bench judgment of
this court.
4. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.