Itxa/253/2009 Of The Ciommissioner Of Income-Tax-1-Nashik v. Shri Vishnuprasad L. Poddar
High Court
07 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/253/2009 Of The Ciommissioner Of Income-Tax-1-Nashik v. Shri Vishnuprasad L. Poddar
Date of order
07 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/253/2009 Of The Ciommissioner Of Income-Tax-1-Nashik v. Shri Vishnuprasad L. Poddar, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/2 * ITXA-253-2009 (SR.64)
7.8.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-1,Nashik…..Appellant
V/s.Shri. Vishnuprasad L. Poddar….Respondent
* * * * *
None for the appellant.
Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar I/by. Mr. M.C. Naniwadekar, Advocate for the respondent.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
P.C. :-
1.None appeared in support of the Appeal when it
was first called out. It was kept back. On being called the
second time, again none appears in support of the Appeal.
2.It appears, the appellant is not desirous ofprosecuting this Appeal. This particularly in view of the
Rane
* 2/2 *
ITXA-253-2009 (SR.64)7.8.2018
fact that Advocate and parties were put to notice on 27thJuly, 2018 that this Appeal would be taken up forconsideration today. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
NeetaDigitally signedby NeetaShaileshShailesh SawantDate:Sawant2018.08.0815:03:53 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.