Case Law › High Court › Itxa/255/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/255/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central) Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Videocon Appliances Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/255/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central) Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Videocon Appliances Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Therefore, for the reasons recorded in the order dated 2nd July, 2008 in Appeal No.26 of 2008, this appeal is also disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.255 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. ¦ Mr.F.Irani with Ms.Rajda i/b ¦ DSR Associates for the Respondent. ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. ¦ DATED:7TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C.: It appears that the identical question of law raised in Appeal No.26 of 2008, which was of the same assesee relating to the assessment year 1996-97. That appeal has been rejected by order dated 2nd July, 2008. Therefore, for the reasons recorded in the order dated 2nd July, 2008 in Appeal No.26 of 2008, this appeal is also disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.