Itxa/2555/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( International )-Ii v. Shri Jayesh Seth
High Court
05 Apr 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2555/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( International )-Ii v. Shri Jayesh Seth
Date of order
05 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/2555/2011 Of The Director Of Income Tax ( International )-Ii v. Shri Jayesh Seth, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2555 OF 2011
The Director of Income Tax (IT)-I, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Jayesh Seth
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 5TH APRIL, 2013
P.C. :-
1.In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 2007-08, following question of law has been raised for our consideration:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in holding that while computing the capital gain, under the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961, the cost of acquisition of the property acquired by way of gift, inheritance
etc. has to be taken as the cost of the previous owner has to be added to the holding period in case of the assessee ?”
2.The issue raised in the present appeal is covered in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the matter of CIT V/s. Manjula J. Shah reported in [2012] 204 Taxman 691 (Bom). In that view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.