Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/256/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/256/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 20, Mumbai v. M/S National Plastic Industries

High Court 24 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/256/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 20, Mumbai v. M/S National Plastic Industries
Date of order
24 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/256/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 20, Mumbai v. M/S National Plastic Industries, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Hence, appeal is rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.256 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.448 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.R.Ashokan for the Appellant. ¦ Ms.Priti V.Shukla i/b Vipul Joshi ¦ for the Respondent. ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. ¦ DATED:24TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. In both these Appeals the assessee is the same, the question that arises for consideration is also the same and therefore, they can be disposed of by a common order. The tribunal has, as a fact, found that the loan was taken through - 2 - proper banking channel and creditor has also filed suit for recovery of the amount, therefore, the transaction was genuine. This is a finding of fact. No question of law arises. Hence, appeal is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan