Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/258/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/258/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Swiss Properties Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/258/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Swiss Properties Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/258/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Swiss Properties Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Hence, the appeals are rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.258 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.288 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. ¦ Mr.R.F.Kanga i/b D.A.K.Jasani for ¦ the Respondent. ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. ¦ DATED:7TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. There is a clear finding recorded that the entire interest income earned by the Respondent is the income from business. In view of the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v/s. Paramount Premises (P) Ltd. 190 ITR 259 and the judgment of theSupreme Court in the - 2 - case of Commissioner of Income-tax v/s. Bokaro Steel Ltd., 236 ITR 315, the learned Counsel for the Appellant was not justified in placing reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd., 227 ITR 172. In our opinion, in view of the reasons given in the judgment of the tribunal, specially paragraphs 6 & 7 thereof, no question of law arises. Hence, the appeals are rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan