Itxa/261/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay v. M/S Honey Diamonds
High Court
12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/261/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay v. M/S Honey Diamonds
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/261/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay v. M/S Honey Diamonds, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Issue: Admit on the following substantial question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in law in allowing the appeal of the assesee and setting aside the order of the assessing officer as to treating the interest earned on Fixed deposits...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.261 OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.261 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Honey Diamonds ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Prashan Uchil for appellant.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Heard. Admit on the following substantial
question of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in law
in allowing the appeal of the assesee and setting
aside the order of the assessing officer as to
treating the interest earned on Fixed deposits as
income from other sources ? "
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.