Case Law › High Court › Itxa/261/2009 Of Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse...

Itxa/261/2009 Of Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse , Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer , Mumbai

High Court 07 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/261/2009 Of Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse , Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer , Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the above view, he is unable to obtain any instructions.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2009 Shri. Sudhakar T. Pendse….AppellantV/s.Income Tax Officer, Mumbai….Respondent * * * * Mr. K. Gopal alongwith Mr. Tanmay Phadke, Advocate for the appellant. -CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. TUESDAY, 7TH AUGUST, 2018. P.C. :1. Mr. Gopal, Learned Counsel appearing in supportof the Appeal, states that the appellant has passed awayon 2nd December, 2010 and his legal heir, one DilipPendse also passed away on 5th July, 2017. In the above view, he is unable to obtain any instructions.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rane 2/2 ITXA—261-2009 (SR.66)7.8.2018 2. However, it is clarified that, in case any person claiming an interest in the estate of theappellant and/or his son, Dilip Pendse, approaches thisCourt with an appropriate application, the same wouldbe considered on its own merits. 3. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) NeetaDigitally signedby NeetaShaileshShailesh SawantDate: 2018.08.09Sawant12:16:16 +0530

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.