Itxa/262/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Bilgi
High Court
21 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/262/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Bilgi
Date of order
21 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/262/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. Bilgi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Thus appeal seeks to raised following question of law:- "The substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is regarding the true scope and correct interpretation of section 263 and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in l...
Decision: In the result, appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.262 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.262 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Niranjan V.Bilgi ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. K.R. Chaudhari for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Singh for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Thus appeal seeks to raised following question of
law:-
"The substantial question of law arises in
the present appeal is regarding the true
scope and correct interpretation of section
263 and other provisions of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and
circumstances of the case and in law, the
Tribunal is right in quashing and setting
aside the order u/s.263 passed by the
jurisdictional Commissioner of Income Tax?"
2. During the course of hearing, we were taken
through the Judgment of the Tribunal more particularly
- = : 2 : = -
paragraph 5 thereof. After having seen the same and
the finding recorded therein clearly demonstrate that
the finding of fact is recorded by the Tribunal based
on appreciation of evidence, which can hardly form
substantial question of law. In the result, appeal is
dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.