Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2627/2010 Of Evershine Traders Pvt....

Itxa/2627/2010 Of Evershine Traders Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 3 (2) And Anr

High Court 16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2627/2010 Of Evershine Traders Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 3 (2) And Anr
Date of order
16 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/2627/2010 Of Evershine Traders Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 3 (2) And Anr, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: Admit on the following question of law :- " Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the jurisdictional preconditions for invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act had been fulfilled in the present case? " 2.By consent, the appeal is taken up for final hearing.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2627 OF 2010 Evershine traders Pvt. Successor to M/s. Khodiyar Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Income Tax Officer 3(2)(2), Mumbai & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate with P.C. Tripathi and Raj Darak for the appellant. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the respondents. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ. DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard. Admit on the following question of law :- " Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the jurisdictional preconditions for invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act had been fulfilled in the present case? " 2.By consent, the appeal is taken up for final hearing. Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. Nikhil Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. [Income Tax Appeal (Lod) No.3006 of 2009] dated 15/3/2010. In this view of the matter, the question raised in this appeal is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 4.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan