Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2667/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2667/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 30 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2667/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/2667/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.In the above view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.161 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd...Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that so far as question(A) & (B) are concerned, the same is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court on 30th June, 2009 in the case of The Commissionerof Income Tax V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakar Karkhana Ltd.in Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008. 2.So far question (c) & (D) are concerned, the same is covered by the judgmentin the case of CIT V/s. ManjaraShetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in [2008] 301 I.T.R. 191. 3.So far question (E) is concerned in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. MalegaonSahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in [2005] 279I.T.R. 19 (Bom.), the said issue is remanded back to the Tribunal for de nova consideration. 4.In the above view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan