In Itxa/2689/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Siddhant Ice Cream Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.2.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.214 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income tax
..Appellant.
M/s.Siddhant Ice Cream Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Shama with P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
P.C. :-
1.On the motion made by the learned counsel appearing for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw the appeal since the tax impact is less than Rs.4 lakhs. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.2.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue