Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2690/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2690/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 7, Mumbai v. M/S Xlo India Limited

High Court 12 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2690/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 7, Mumbai v. M/S Xlo India Limited
Date of order
12 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2690/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 7, Mumbai v. M/S Xlo India Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.259 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant. V/s. M/s.XLO India Ltd...Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Sameer Dalal for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1.The appeal filed by the revenue against the assessee for the earlier assessment years have already been dismissed. One of such order was passed on 25th June, 2008 in Income Tax Appeal No.1280 of 2008 in the case of assessee and the said order has attained finality. Under the circumstances, no substantial question of arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan