Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India
High Court
08 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India
Date of order
08 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.270 OF 2009
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.270 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bafna Transport India ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for appellant.
Mr.K.Gopal for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Considering the acceptance of the accounting system of
the respondent for past 30 years by the Department
without any objection and the finding that section 40
A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act is not applicable to the
facts of this case, the view taken by the Tribunal
cannot be faulted. Over and above this, no case is
made to show that any substantial question of law
arise in this matter. Appeal is dismissed with no
order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.