Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India

High Court 08 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India
Date of order
08 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/270/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13, Mumbai v. M/S Bafna Transport India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.270 OF 2009 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.270 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Bafna Transport India ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for appellant. Mr.K.Gopal for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Considering the acceptance of the accounting system of the respondent for past 30 years by the Department without any objection and the finding that section 40 A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act is not applicable to the facts of this case, the view taken by the Tribunal cannot be faulted. Over and above this, no case is made to show that any substantial question of law arise in this matter. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan