Itxa/2716/2010 Of The Com,Missionr Of Income-Tax-City-Xiv,Mum v. Shri Anand T. Sidhwani
High Court
27 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2716/2010 Of The Com,Missionr Of Income-Tax-City-Xiv,Mum v. Shri Anand T. Sidhwani
Date of order
27 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/2716/2010 Of The Com,Missionr Of Income-Tax-City-Xiv,Mum v. Shri Anand T. Sidhwani, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.166 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.166 OF 2005WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.144 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax.City - XIV, Mumbai....AppellantV/s.Anand T. Sidhwani...Respondent
Mr.Suraj M. Shah i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the Respondent.
P.C. :
1.The tax incidence in this case is less thanRs.4 lakhs. In view of the circular issued by theC.B.D.T., the learned Counsel seeks leave to withdrawthe Appeal alongwith the Motion. The question of law,if any, is left open for consideration in appropriateproceedings.
2.The Motion alongwith the Appeal standsdismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as tocosts. Refund of Court fees as per rules. C.C.expedited.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[F.I. REBELLO, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue