Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2724/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2724/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. Satra Properties And Holdings Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2724/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. Satra Properties And Holdings Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2724/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-10, Mumbai v. Satra Properties And Holdings Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1961 0F 2005 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.868 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1961 0F 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.868 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Satra Properties Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- On instructions the learned counsel states as the tax incidence is less than Rs.4 lakhs, he seeks leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion and the appeal. The Motion and Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Issue of law, if any, is left open for consideration in an appropriate case. Refund of Court fee as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan