Itxa/2731/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Tds) v. M/S Pennzoil Quake State India Ltd
High Court
16 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2731/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Tds) v. M/S Pennzoil Quake State India Ltd
Date of order
16 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2731/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Tds) v. M/S Pennzoil Quake State India Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee had deducted tax at source bonafide and hence the assessing officer was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this a...
Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2731 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Ta (TDS), Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Pennzoil Quaker State India Ltd.(Formerly known as M/s. Pennzoil India Ltd.)
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee had deducted tax at source bonafide and hence the assessing officer was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The Tribunal relying upon its decision in the assessee's own
case for earlier years has held that the amount of tax deducted at source was bonafide and, therefore, the assessing officer was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. There is nothing on record to show that the revenue has challenged the decision of the ITAT for the earlier years. Moreover, no argument is advanced on behalf of the revenue to show that the decision of the ITAT suffers from any infirmity. Hence, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.