Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/273/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/273/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. The Saswad Mali Sugar Factory Ltd

High Court 19 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/273/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. The Saswad Mali Sugar Factory Ltd
Date of order
19 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/273/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv v. The Saswad Mali Sugar Factory Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the incentives received by the assessee from the Central Government amounting to Rs.2.75 crores was a capital receipt and not a revenue receipt as held by the assessing officer, is the basic question raised in this...

Decision: Accordingly, we see no reason to entertain the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa273-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.273 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV ..Appellant. V/s. The Saswad Sugar Factory Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, senior Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the incentives received by the assessee from the Central Government amounting to Rs.2.75 crores was a capital receipt and not a revenue receipt as held by the assessing officer, is the basic question raised in this appeal. 2. The ITAT in para 17 of its order has recorded a finding that the incentives received by the assessee is under the same scheme which was considered by the Apex Court in the case of CIT V/s. Ponni Sugar and Chemicals Ltd. reported in [2008] 306 ITR 392 (SC) wherein the Apex Court has held that the incentives received by the assessee therein would be capital receipt. It is the contention of the revenue that since the assessee is a restructured company, it cannot be said that the incentives received were capital receipt. In the absence of any material on record to show that the incentive received by a restructured company would be an incentive liable to be treated as revenue receipt, in our opinion, no fault can be found with the decision of the ITAT in upholding the claim of the assessee by following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ponni Sugar and Chemicals Ltd. (supra). Accordingly, we see no reason to entertain the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan