In Itxa/274/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 Bombay v. M/S. Raj Oil Mills, Bombay, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, appeal is dismissed in (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 274 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-20,Mumbai.V/s.
M/s.Raj Oil Mills.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
R.Ashokan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16th April 2009.
P.C. :----.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused appeal papers.
2.Having seen the findings recorded by theTribunal in para-6 of the impugned order, we do notsee any substantial question of law involved in this
appeal. The question sought to be raised is based on
appreciation of evidence.
3.
limine with no order as to costs.
In the result, appeal is dismissed in
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue